Which claims should I assert first?

What should the initial selection include?

Compare each proposed claim limitation with the relevant product evidence and identify gaps that require investigation. Rule 11(b) requires a reasonable inquiry and support for factual and legal contentions in court filings. Claim selection should follow that inquiry, not the number of patents available.

Can I save other theories for later?

Do not assume they can be added freely. For example, Northern District of California Patent Local Rule 3-1 requires early identification of asserted claims and accused instrumentalities, while Rule 3-6 requires a timely showing of good cause for amendments. Other courts use their own rules and orders.

How does claim interpretation fit?

Read the proposed claims in their patent context under Phillips v. AWH. Explain which disputed terms matter to the evidence and why. The court's schedule and disclosure requirements should guide when the selection is revisited.